The project you only run once
Ascent’s Migrate your SQL Server to Azure service is built assessment-first, because the assessment is what makes the exit permanent rather than cosmetic: it establishes which workloads can take the versionless tiers, which need the control of a virtual machine, and in what sequence the estate should move.
Delivery then runs as a governed migration under the Modernise–Optimise–Protect framework – performance baselined before cutover, cost engineered through Azure Hybrid Benefit and right-sizing rather than discovered on the first invoice, security and compliance controls carried across by design.
Because Ascent is a Microsoft Direct CSP, the commercial layer can sit under the same accountability as the delivery: licensing, Azure consumption and, where a short bridge is genuinely unavoidable, the ESU licensing itself.
One partner accountable for the migration and for the commercial ground it stands on – that is what turns Migrate your SQL Server to Azure from a project into the end of a cycle.
The 2016 deadline has already passed, and the next two are dated. The choice in front of a 2016 estate is between running the last standstill project deliberately – once, properly, to a destination without deadlines – or funding the next one by default.
The question is not whether you can afford the migration. It is how many more standstill projects you intend to fund.